Identifying the beginning of painting in Florence is
complicated by the lack of recorded data, further hindered by the low survival
rate of many of the paintings, not to mention the damage to existing ones. And
then there is the problem of geography; was Florentine painting produced by
artists living in Florence, or do we take account of schools from other cities
like Lucca and Pisa. Richard Offner writes of “the track of Florentine painting,
“an examination of early Florentine painting complicated by a steady
infiltration of Lucchese or Pisan elements in paintings found on Florentine
ground.”[1] This approach is completely different from
art historians who underplay the importance of satellite schools on the
development of Florentine art; but the achievement of painters like Cimabue and
Giotto (both synonymous with the early stages of Florentine art ) must be
considered in relation to artists from centres outside Florence such as Lucca.Painters like Cimabue, usually considered the first great Florentine worked as far afield as Arezzo.
[1]
Richard Offner, “The Mostra del Tesoro di Firenze Sacra-I”, The Burlington
Magazine for Connoisseurs, Vol. 63, No. 365 (Aug., 1933), pp. 72-84
No comments:
Post a Comment